Papers

Electronic versions are provided as a professional courtesy to ensure timely dissemination of academic work for individual, noncommercial purposes.
Copyright and all rights therein resides with the respective copyright holders, as stated within each paper.
These files may not be reposted without permission.

• Cai, Y., Urgolites, Z., Wood, J. N., Chen, C., Li, S., Chen, A., & Xue, G. (in press). Distinct neural substrates for visual short-term memory of actions. Human Brain Mapping.


• Wood, J. N. & Wood, S. M. W. (2018). The development of invariant object recognition requires visual experience with temporally smooth objects. Cognitive Science, 1-16. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12595


• Wood, J. N. (2017). Spontaneous preference for slowly moving objects in visually naïve animals. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 111-122. doi: 10.1162/OPMI_a_00012


• Wood, J. N., & Wood, S. M. W. (2017). Measuring the speed of newborn object recognition in controlled visual worlds. Developmental Science. doi: 10.1111/desc.12470


• Wood, J. N. (2016). A smoothness constraint on the development of object recognition. Cognition, 153, 140-145.


• Wood, J. N. & Wood, S. M. W. (2106). The development of newborn object recognition in fast and slow visual worlds. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences. 283 (1829) http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0166


• Wood, J. N., Prasad, A., Goldman, J. G., & Wood, S. M. W. (2016). Enhanced learning of natural visual sequences in newborn chicks. Animal Cognition. 19(4), 835-845


• Wood, S. M. W., & Wood, J. N. (2015). Newly hatched chicks recognize faces at the onset of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition, 41(2), 206-215.


• Wood, S. M. W., & Wood, J. N. (2015). Chickens as an animal model for studying the emergence of invariant object recognition. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 9(7), 1-12.


• Goldman, J. G., & Wood, J. N. (2015). An automated controlled-rearing method for studying the origins of movement recognition. Animal Cognition, 18, 723–731.


• Wood, J. N. (2015). Characterizing the information content of a newly hatched chick’s first visual object representation. Developmental Science, 18(2), 194-205.


• Wood, J. N. (2014). Newly hatched chicks solve the visual binding problem. Psychological Science, 25, 1475-1481.


• Wood., J. N. (2013). Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


• Urgolites, Z. J. & Wood, J. N. (2013). Binding actions and scenes in visual long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0440-1.


• Urgolites, Z. J. & Wood, J. N. (2013). Visual long-term memory stores high fidelity representations of observed actions. Psychological Science, 24(4), 403-411.


• Endress, A., & Wood, J.N. (2011). From movements to actions: Two mechanisms for learning action sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 141-171.
• Watch Demo Videos


• Hyde, D., & Wood, J. N. (2011). Spatial attention determines the nature of non-verbal numerical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2336-2351.


• Wood, J. N. (2011). A core knowledge architecture of visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 357-381.


• Wood, J. N. (2011). When do spatial and visual working memory interact? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73, 420-439.


• Wood, J.N. & Hauser, M. D. (2011). Replication of ‘The perception of rational, goal-directed action in nonhuman primates’. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.1202596 (Addendum/Correction).


• Hauser, M. D., & Wood, J. N. (2011). Replication of ‘Rhesus monkeys correctly read the goal-relevant gestures of a human agent’. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1441. (Addendum/Correction).


• Wood, J. N. (2010). Visual working memory retains movement information within an allocentric reference frame. Visual Cognition, 18(10), 1464-1485.


• Hauser, M. D., & Wood, J. N. (2010). Evolving the capacity to understand actions, intentions and goals. Annual Review of Psychology (61), 303-324.


• Wood, J. N. (2009). Distinct visual working memory systems for view-dependent and view-invariant representation. PLoS ONE, 4(8): e6601. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006601.


• Wood, J. N., Kouider, S., & Carey, S. (2009). Acquisition of Singular-plural Morphology. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 202-206.


• Wood, J. N., & Hauser, M. D. (2008). Action comprehension in nonhuman primates: Motor simulation or inferential reasoning? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 461-465.


• Wood, J. N. (2008). Visual memory for agents and their actions. Cognition, 108, 522-532.


• Barner, D., Wood, J. N., Hauser, M. D., & Carey, S. (2008). Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys. Cognition, 107, 603-622.
• Watch Demo Videos


• Wood, J. N., Glynn, D. D. & Hauser, M. D. (2008). Rhesus Monkeys’ Understanding of Actions and Goals. Social Neuroscience, 3(1), 60-68.


• Wood, J. N., Hauser, M. D., Glynn, D. D., & Barner, D. (2008). Free-ranging rhesus monkeys spontaneously individuate and enumerate small numbers of non-solid portions. Cognition, 106, 207-221.
• Watch Demo Videos


• Wood, J. N. (2007). Visual working memory for observed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 639-652.
• Note: Paper received Young Investigator Award From APA


• Wood, J. N., Glynn, D. D., Philips, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The perception of rational, goal-directed action in non-human primates. Science, 317(5843), 1402-1405.
• Watch Demo Videos


• Wood, J. N., Glynn, D. D., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The uniquely human capacity to throw evolved from a non-throwing primate: An evolutionary dissociation between action and perception. Biology Letters, 3(4), 360-364.


• Hauser, M. D., Glynn, D. D., & Wood, J. N. (2007). Rhesus monkeys correctly read the goal-relevant gestures of a human agent. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B. 274(1620), 1913-1918.
• Watch Demo Videos


• Stevens, J., Wood, J. N., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinas oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Animal Cognition, 10, 429-437.


• Barner, D., Thalwitz, D., Wood, J., Yang, S., & Carey, S. (2007). On the relation between the acquisition of singular–plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one. Developmental Science, 10(7), 365-373.


• Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J. N., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: The singular-plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 1-25.


• Wood, J. N., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Chronometric studies of numerical cognition in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 97, 23-39.


• Wood, J. N., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Infants’ enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Developmental Science, 8(2), 173-181.